![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ax12i | Unicode version |
Description: Inference that has ax-12 1854 (without A. ) as its conclusion. Uses
only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. The hypotheses may be eliminable
without one or more of these axioms in special cases. Proof similar to
Lemma 16 of [Tarski] p. 70.
(Contributed by NM, 20-May-2008.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ax12i.1 | |
ax12i.2 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ax12i |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax12i.1 | . 2 | |
2 | ax12i.2 | . . 3 | |
3 | 1 | biimprcd 225 | . . 3 |
4 | 2, 3 | alrimih 1642 | . 2 |
5 | 1, 4 | syl6bi 228 | 1 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: -> wi 4 <-> wb 184
A. wal 1393 |
This theorem is referenced by: ax12wlem 1828 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1618 ax-4 1631 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 185 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |