![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > carden | Unicode version |
Description: Two sets are equinumerous
iff their cardinal numbers are equal. This
important theorem expresses the essential concept behind
"cardinality" or
"size." This theorem appears as Proposition 10.10 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 85, Theorem 7P of [Enderton] p. 197,
and Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 242
(among others). The Axiom of Choice is required for its proof. Related
theorems are hasheni 12421 and the finite-set-only hashen 12420.
This theorem is also known as Hume's Principle. Gottlob Frege's two-volume Grundgesetze der Arithmetik used his Basic Law V to prove this theorem. Unfortunately Basic Law V caused Frege's system to be inconsistent because it was subject to Russell's paradox (see ru 3326). Later scholars have found that Frege primarily used Basic Law V to Hume's Principle. If Basic Law V is replaced by Hume's Principle in Frege's system, much of Frege's work is restored. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, once Basic Law V is replaced, proves "Frege's theorem" (the Peano axioms of arithmetic can be derived in second-order logic from Hume's principle). See https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege-theorem . We take a different approach, using first-order logic and ZFC, to prove the Peano axioms of arithmetic. The theory of cardinality can also be developed without AC by introducing "card" as a primitive notion and stating this theorem as an axiom, as is done with the axiom for cardinal numbers in [Suppes] p. 111. Finally, if we allow the Axiom of Regularity, we can avoid AC by defining the cardinal number of a set as the set of all sets equinumerous to it and having the least possible rank (see karden 8334). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
carden |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | numth3 8871 | . . . . . 6 | |
2 | 1 | ad2antrr 725 | . . . . 5 |
3 | cardid2 8355 | . . . . 5 | |
4 | ensym 7584 | . . . . 5 | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3syl 20 | . . . 4 |
6 | simpr 461 | . . . . 5 | |
7 | numth3 8871 | . . . . . . 7 | |
8 | 7 | ad2antlr 726 | . . . . . 6 |
9 | 8 | cardidd 8945 | . . . . 5 |
10 | 6, 9 | eqbrtrd 4472 | . . . 4 |
11 | entr 7587 | . . . 4 | |
12 | 5, 10, 11 | syl2anc 661 | . . 3 |
13 | 12 | ex 434 | . 2 |
14 | carden2b 8369 | . 2 | |
15 | 13, 14 | impbid1 203 | 1 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: -> wi 4 <-> wb 184
/\ wa 369 = wceq 1395 e. wcel 1818
class class class wbr 4452 dom cdm 5004
` cfv 5593 cen 7533 ccrd 8337 |
This theorem is referenced by: cardeq0 8948 ficard 8961 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1618 ax-4 1631 ax-5 1704 ax-6 1747 ax-7 1790 ax-8 1820 ax-9 1822 ax-10 1837 ax-11 1842 ax-12 1854 ax-13 1999 ax-ext 2435 ax-rep 4563 ax-sep 4573 ax-nul 4581 ax-pow 4630 ax-pr 4691 ax-un 6592 ax-ac2 8864 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 185 df-or 370 df-an 371 df-3or 974 df-3an 975 df-tru 1398 df-ex 1613 df-nf 1617 df-sb 1740 df-eu 2286 df-mo 2287 df-clab 2443 df-cleq 2449 df-clel 2452 df-nfc 2607 df-ne 2654 df-ral 2812 df-rex 2813 df-reu 2814 df-rmo 2815 df-rab 2816 df-v 3111 df-sbc 3328 df-csb 3435 df-dif 3478 df-un 3480 df-in 3482 df-ss 3489 df-pss 3491 df-nul 3785 df-if 3942 df-pw 4014 df-sn 4030 df-pr 4032 df-tp 4034 df-op 4036 df-uni 4250 df-int 4287 df-iun 4332 df-br 4453 df-opab 4511 df-mpt 4512 df-tr 4546 df-eprel 4796 df-id 4800 df-po 4805 df-so 4806 df-fr 4843 df-se 4844 df-we 4845 df-ord 4886 df-on 4887 df-suc 4889 df-xp 5010 df-rel 5011 df-cnv 5012 df-co 5013 df-dm 5014 df-rn 5015 df-res 5016 df-ima 5017 df-iota 5556 df-fun 5595 df-fn 5596 df-f 5597 df-f1 5598 df-fo 5599 df-f1o 5600 df-fv 5601 df-isom 5602 df-riota 6257 df-recs 7061 df-er 7330 df-en 7537 df-card 8341 df-ac 8518 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |