Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem fin23lem38

Description: Lemma for fin23 . The contradictory chain has no minimum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses fin23lem33.f 𝐹 = { 𝑔 ∣ ∀ 𝑎 ∈ ( 𝒫 𝑔m ω ) ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝑎 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ⊆ ( 𝑎𝑥 ) → ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎 ) }
fin23lem.f ( 𝜑 : ω –1-1→ V )
fin23lem.g ( 𝜑 ran 𝐺 )
fin23lem.h ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑗 ( ( 𝑗 : ω –1-1→ V ∧ ran 𝑗𝐺 ) → ( ( 𝑖𝑗 ) : ω –1-1→ V ∧ ran ( 𝑖𝑗 ) ⊊ ran 𝑗 ) ) )
fin23lem.i 𝑌 = ( rec ( 𝑖 , ) ↾ ω )
Assertion fin23lem38 ( 𝜑 → ¬ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 fin23lem33.f 𝐹 = { 𝑔 ∣ ∀ 𝑎 ∈ ( 𝒫 𝑔m ω ) ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝑎 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ⊆ ( 𝑎𝑥 ) → ran 𝑎 ∈ ran 𝑎 ) }
2 fin23lem.f ( 𝜑 : ω –1-1→ V )
3 fin23lem.g ( 𝜑 ran 𝐺 )
4 fin23lem.h ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑗 ( ( 𝑗 : ω –1-1→ V ∧ ran 𝑗𝐺 ) → ( ( 𝑖𝑗 ) : ω –1-1→ V ∧ ran ( 𝑖𝑗 ) ⊊ ran 𝑗 ) ) )
5 fin23lem.i 𝑌 = ( rec ( 𝑖 , ) ↾ ω )
6 peano2 ( 𝑑 ∈ ω → suc 𝑑 ∈ ω )
7 eqid ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) = ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 )
8 fveq2 ( 𝑏 = suc 𝑑 → ( 𝑌𝑏 ) = ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) )
9 8 rneqd ( 𝑏 = suc 𝑑 → ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) = ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) )
10 9 unieqd ( 𝑏 = suc 𝑑 ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) = ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) )
11 10 rspceeqv ( ( suc 𝑑 ∈ ω ∧ ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) = ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ) → ∃ 𝑏 ∈ ω ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) )
12 7 11 mpan2 ( suc 𝑑 ∈ ω → ∃ 𝑏 ∈ ω ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) )
13 fvex ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ V
14 13 rnex ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ V
15 14 uniex ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ V
16 eqid ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) = ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) )
17 16 elrnmpt ( ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ V → ( ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ↔ ∃ 𝑏 ∈ ω ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) )
18 15 17 ax-mp ( ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ↔ ∃ 𝑏 ∈ ω ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) )
19 12 18 sylibr ( suc 𝑑 ∈ ω → ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) )
20 6 19 syl ( 𝑑 ∈ ω → ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) )
21 20 adantl ( ( 𝜑𝑑 ∈ ω ) → ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) )
22 intss1 ( ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) → ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ⊆ ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) )
23 21 22 syl ( ( 𝜑𝑑 ∈ ω ) → ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ⊆ ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) )
24 1 2 3 4 5 fin23lem35 ( ( 𝜑𝑑 ∈ ω ) → ran ( 𝑌 ‘ suc 𝑑 ) ⊊ ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
25 23 24 sspsstrd ( ( 𝜑𝑑 ∈ ω ) → ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ⊊ ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
26 dfpss2 ( ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ⊊ ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) ↔ ( ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ⊆ ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) ∧ ¬ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) ) )
27 26 simprbi ( ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ⊊ ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) → ¬ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
28 25 27 syl ( ( 𝜑𝑑 ∈ ω ) → ¬ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
29 28 nrexdv ( 𝜑 → ¬ ∃ 𝑑 ∈ ω ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
30 fveq2 ( 𝑏 = 𝑑 → ( 𝑌𝑏 ) = ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
31 30 rneqd ( 𝑏 = 𝑑 → ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
32 31 unieqd ( 𝑏 = 𝑑 ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
33 32 cbvmptv ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) = ( 𝑑 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
34 33 elrnmpt ( ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) → ( ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ↔ ∃ 𝑑 ∈ ω ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) ) )
35 34 ibi ( ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) → ∃ 𝑑 ∈ ω ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) = ran ( 𝑌𝑑 ) )
36 29 35 nsyl ( 𝜑 → ¬ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) ∈ ran ( 𝑏 ∈ ω ↦ ran ( 𝑌𝑏 ) ) )