Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  wi Unicode version

Syntax Definition wi 4
 Description: If and are wff's, so is or " implies ." Part of the recursive definition of a wff. The resulting wff is (interpreted as) false when is true and is false; it is true otherwise. Think of the truth table for an OR gate with input connected through an inverter. After we define the axioms of propositional calculus (ax-1 6, ax-2 7, ax-3 8, and ax-mp 5), the biconditional (df-bi 179), the constant true (df-tru 1337), and the constant false (df-fal 1338), we will be able to prove these truth table values: (truimtru 1362), (truimfal 1363), (falimtru 1364), and (falimfal 1365). These have straightforward meanings, for example, just means "the value of -> is ". The left-hand wff is called the antecedent, and the right-hand wff is called the consequent. In the case of , the middle may be informally called either an antecedent or part of the consequent depending on context. Contrast with <-> (df-bi 179), /\ (df-an 362), and \/ (df-or 361). This is called "material implication" and the arrow is usually read as "implies." However, material implication is not identical to the meaning of "implies" in natural language. For example, the word "implies" may suggest a causal relationship in natural language. Material implication does not require any causal relationship. Also, note that in material implication, if the consequent is true then the wff is always true (even if the antecedent is false). Thus, if "implies" means material implication, it is true that "if the moon is made of green cheese that implies that 5=5" (because 5=5). Similarly, if the antecedent is false, the wff is always true. Thus, it is true that, "if the moon made of green cheese that implies that 5=7" (because the moon is not actually made of green cheese). A contradiction implies anything (pm2.21i 126). In short, material implication has a very specific technical definition, and misunderstandings of it are sometimes called "paradoxes of logical implication."
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
wph
wps
Assertion
Ref Expression
wi

This syntax is primitive. The first axiom using it is ax-1 6.

 Colors of variables: wff set class
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator