Description: Proof of ax-7 from ax7v1 and ax7v2 (and earlier axioms), proving sufficiency of the conjunction of the latter two weakened versions of ax7v , which is itself a weakened version of ax-7 .
Note that the weakened version of ax-7 obtained by adding a disjoint variable condition on x , z (resp. on y , z ) does not permit, together with the other axioms, to prove reflexivity (resp. symmetry). (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2020)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | ax7 | |- ( x = y -> ( x = z -> y = z ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax7v2 | |- ( x = t -> ( x = y -> t = y ) ) |
|
2 | ax7v2 | |- ( x = t -> ( x = z -> t = z ) ) |
|
3 | ax7v1 | |- ( t = y -> ( t = z -> y = z ) ) |
|
4 | 3 | imp | |- ( ( t = y /\ t = z ) -> y = z ) |
5 | 4 | a1i | |- ( x = t -> ( ( t = y /\ t = z ) -> y = z ) ) |
6 | 1 2 5 | syl2and | |- ( x = t -> ( ( x = y /\ x = z ) -> y = z ) ) |
7 | ax6evr | |- E. t x = t |
|
8 | 6 7 | exlimiiv | |- ( ( x = y /\ x = z ) -> y = z ) |
9 | 8 | ex | |- ( x = y -> ( x = z -> y = z ) ) |