Description: Closed form of aleximi . Note: this proof is shorter, so aleximi could be deduced from it ( exim would have to be proved first, see bj-eximALT but its proof is shorter (currently almost a subproof of aleximi )). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Nov-2021)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | bj-alexim | |- ( A. x ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) ) -> ( A. x ph -> ( E. x ps -> E. x ch ) ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | alim | |- ( A. x ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) ) -> ( A. x ph -> A. x ( ps -> ch ) ) ) |
|
2 | exim | |- ( A. x ( ps -> ch ) -> ( E. x ps -> E. x ch ) ) |
|
3 | 1 2 | syl6 | |- ( A. x ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) ) -> ( A. x ph -> ( E. x ps -> E. x ch ) ) ) |