Description: Define restricted universal quantification. Special case of Definition 4.15(3) of TakeutiZaring p. 22.
Note: This notation is most often used to express that ph holds for all elements of a given class A . For this reading F/_ x A is required, though, for example, asserted when x and A are disjoint.
Should instead A depend on x , you rather focus on those x that happen to be contained in the corresponding A ( x ) . This hardly used interpretation could still occur naturally. For some examples, look at ralndv1 or ralndv2 , courtesy of AV.
So be careful to either keep A independent of x , or adjust your comments to include such exotic cases. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | df-ral | |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x ( x e. A -> ph ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
0 | vx | |- x |
|
1 | cA | |- A |
|
2 | wph | |- ph |
|
3 | 2 0 1 | wral | |- A. x e. A ph |
4 | 0 | cv | |- x |
5 | 4 1 | wcel | |- x e. A |
6 | 5 2 | wi | |- ( x e. A -> ph ) |
7 | 6 0 | wal | |- A. x ( x e. A -> ph ) |
8 | 3 7 | wb | |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x ( x e. A -> ph ) ) |