Description: Deduction for elimination by cases. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2013) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Sep-2024)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | ecase3ad.1 | |- ( ph -> ( ps -> th ) ) |
|
| ecase3ad.2 | |- ( ph -> ( ch -> th ) ) |
||
| ecase3ad.3 | |- ( ph -> ( ( -. ps /\ -. ch ) -> th ) ) |
||
| Assertion | ecase3ad | |- ( ph -> th ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ecase3ad.1 | |- ( ph -> ( ps -> th ) ) |
|
| 2 | ecase3ad.2 | |- ( ph -> ( ch -> th ) ) |
|
| 3 | ecase3ad.3 | |- ( ph -> ( ( -. ps /\ -. ch ) -> th ) ) |
|
| 4 | 1 | imp | |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> th ) |
| 5 | 2 | imp | |- ( ( ph /\ ch ) -> th ) |
| 6 | 3 | imp | |- ( ( ph /\ ( -. ps /\ -. ch ) ) -> th ) |
| 7 | 4 5 6 | pm2.61ddan | |- ( ph -> th ) |