Description: Substitution for the second argument of the non-logical predicate in an atomic formula. See elsb1 for substitution for the first argument. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 3-Apr-2010) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 24-Jul-2023)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | elsb2 | |- ( [ y / x ] z e. x <-> z e. y ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | elequ2 | |- ( x = w -> ( z e. x <-> z e. w ) ) |
|
2 | elequ2 | |- ( w = y -> ( z e. w <-> z e. y ) ) |
|
3 | 1 2 | sbievw2 | |- ( [ y / x ] z e. x <-> z e. y ) |