Description: Soundness justification theorem for eu6 when this was the definition of the unique existential quantifier (note that y and z need not be disjoint, although the weaker theorem with that disjoint variable condition added would be enough to justify the soundness of the definition). See eujustALT for a proof that provides an example of how it can be achieved through the use of dvelim . (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2010) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | eujust | |- ( E. y A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) <-> E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | equequ2 | |- ( y = w -> ( x = y <-> x = w ) ) |
|
2 | 1 | bibi2d | |- ( y = w -> ( ( ph <-> x = y ) <-> ( ph <-> x = w ) ) ) |
3 | 2 | albidv | |- ( y = w -> ( A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) <-> A. x ( ph <-> x = w ) ) ) |
4 | 3 | cbvexvw | |- ( E. y A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) <-> E. w A. x ( ph <-> x = w ) ) |
5 | equequ2 | |- ( w = z -> ( x = w <-> x = z ) ) |
|
6 | 5 | bibi2d | |- ( w = z -> ( ( ph <-> x = w ) <-> ( ph <-> x = z ) ) ) |
7 | 6 | albidv | |- ( w = z -> ( A. x ( ph <-> x = w ) <-> A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) ) ) |
8 | 7 | cbvexvw | |- ( E. w A. x ( ph <-> x = w ) <-> E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) ) |
9 | 4 8 | bitri | |- ( E. y A. x ( ph <-> x = y ) <-> E. z A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) ) |