Description: There exist two sets, one a member of the other.
This theorem looks similar to el , but its meaning is different. It only depends on the axioms ax-mp to ax-4 , ax-6 , and ax-pr . This theorem does not exclude that these two sets could actually be one single set containing itself. That two different sets exist is proved by exexneq . (Contributed by SN, 23-Dec-2024)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | exel | |- E. y E. x x e. y |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax-pr | |- E. y A. x ( ( x = z \/ x = z ) -> x e. y ) |
|
2 | ax6ev | |- E. x x = z |
|
3 | pm2.07 | |- ( x = z -> ( x = z \/ x = z ) ) |
|
4 | 2 3 | eximii | |- E. x ( x = z \/ x = z ) |
5 | exim | |- ( A. x ( ( x = z \/ x = z ) -> x e. y ) -> ( E. x ( x = z \/ x = z ) -> E. x x e. y ) ) |
|
6 | 4 5 | mpi | |- ( A. x ( ( x = z \/ x = z ) -> x e. y ) -> E. x x e. y ) |
7 | 1 6 | eximii | |- E. y E. x x e. y |