Description: A -> identity. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 22-Oct-2010) An alternate proof is possible using falim instead of id but the present proof using id emphasizes that the result does not require the principle of explosion. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assertion | falimfal | |- ( ( F. -> F. ) <-> T. ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | id | |- ( F. -> F. ) |
|
| 2 | 1 | bitru | |- ( ( F. -> F. ) <-> T. ) |