Description: Deduction adding nested consequents. Deduction associated with imim1 and imim1i . (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Sep-2012)
| Ref | Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | imim1d.1 | |- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) ) |
|
| Assertion | imim1d | |- ( ph -> ( ( ch -> th ) -> ( ps -> th ) ) ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | imim1d.1 | |- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) ) |
|
| 2 | idd | |- ( ph -> ( th -> th ) ) |
|
| 3 | 1 2 | imim12d | |- ( ph -> ( ( ch -> th ) -> ( ps -> th ) ) ) |