Metamath Proof Explorer
Description: Deduction for generalization rule for negated wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016)
|
|
Ref |
Expression |
|
Hypotheses |
nexd.1 |
|- F/ x ph |
|
|
nexd.2 |
|- ( ph -> -. ps ) |
|
Assertion |
nexd |
|- ( ph -> -. E. x ps ) |
Proof
Step |
Hyp |
Ref |
Expression |
1 |
|
nexd.1 |
|- F/ x ph |
2 |
|
nexd.2 |
|- ( ph -> -. ps ) |
3 |
1
|
nf5ri |
|- ( ph -> A. x ph ) |
4 |
3 2
|
nexdh |
|- ( ph -> -. E. x ps ) |