Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem upgrwlkedg

Description: The edges of a walk in a pseudograph join exactly the two corresponding adjacent vertices in the walk. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2021)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis upgrwlkedg.i 
|- I = ( iEdg ` G )
Assertion upgrwlkedg 
|- ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ F ( Walks ` G ) P ) -> A. k e. ( 0 ..^ ( # ` F ) ) ( I ` ( F ` k ) ) = { ( P ` k ) , ( P ` ( k + 1 ) ) } )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 upgrwlkedg.i 
 |-  I = ( iEdg ` G )
2 eqid 
 |-  ( Vtx ` G ) = ( Vtx ` G )
3 2 1 upgriswlk 
 |-  ( G e. UPGraph -> ( F ( Walks ` G ) P <-> ( F e. Word dom I /\ P : ( 0 ... ( # ` F ) ) --> ( Vtx ` G ) /\ A. k e. ( 0 ..^ ( # ` F ) ) ( I ` ( F ` k ) ) = { ( P ` k ) , ( P ` ( k + 1 ) ) } ) ) )
4 simp3 
 |-  ( ( F e. Word dom I /\ P : ( 0 ... ( # ` F ) ) --> ( Vtx ` G ) /\ A. k e. ( 0 ..^ ( # ` F ) ) ( I ` ( F ` k ) ) = { ( P ` k ) , ( P ` ( k + 1 ) ) } ) -> A. k e. ( 0 ..^ ( # ` F ) ) ( I ` ( F ` k ) ) = { ( P ` k ) , ( P ` ( k + 1 ) ) } )
5 3 4 biimtrdi 
 |-  ( G e. UPGraph -> ( F ( Walks ` G ) P -> A. k e. ( 0 ..^ ( # ` F ) ) ( I ` ( F ` k ) ) = { ( P ` k ) , ( P ` ( k + 1 ) ) } ) )
6 5 imp 
 |-  ( ( G e. UPGraph /\ F ( Walks ` G ) P ) -> A. k e. ( 0 ..^ ( # ` F ) ) ( I ` ( F ` k ) ) = { ( P ` k ) , ( P ` ( k + 1 ) ) } )