Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem 3noncolr1N

Description: Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 place). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses 3noncol.l ⊢ ≤ ˙ = ≤ K
3noncol.j ⊢ ∨ ˙ = join ⁡ K
3noncol.a ⊢ A = Atoms ⁡ K
Assertion 3noncolr1N ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ P ∈ A ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ R ∈ A ∧ P ≠ Q ∧ ¬ R ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q → R ≠ P ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ R ∨ ˙ P

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 3noncol.l ⊢ ≤ ˙ = ≤ K
2 3noncol.j ⊢ ∨ ˙ = join ⁡ K
3 3noncol.a ⊢ A = Atoms ⁡ K
4 simp1 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ P ∈ A ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ R ∈ A ∧ P ≠ Q ∧ ¬ R ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q → K ∈ HL
5 simp22 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ P ∈ A ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ R ∈ A ∧ P ≠ Q ∧ ¬ R ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q → Q ∈ A
6 simp23 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ P ∈ A ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ R ∈ A ∧ P ≠ Q ∧ ¬ R ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q → R ∈ A
7 simp21 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ P ∈ A ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ R ∈ A ∧ P ≠ Q ∧ ¬ R ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q → P ∈ A
8 1 2 3 3noncolr2 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ P ∈ A ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ R ∈ A ∧ P ≠ Q ∧ ¬ R ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q → Q ≠ R ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ Q ∨ ˙ R
9 1 2 3 3noncolr2 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ R ∈ A ∧ P ∈ A ∧ Q ≠ R ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ Q ∨ ˙ R → R ≠ P ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ R ∨ ˙ P
10 4 5 6 7 8 9 syl131anc ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ P ∈ A ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ R ∈ A ∧ P ≠ Q ∧ ¬ R ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q → R ≠ P ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ R ∨ ˙ P