Description: Axiom ax-c14 is redundant if we assume ax-5 . Remark 9.6 in Megill p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint), regarding axiom scheme C14'.
Note that w is a dummy variable introduced in the proof. Its purpose is to satisfy the distinct variable requirements of dveel2 and ax-5 . By the end of the proof it has vanished, and the final theorem has no distinct variable requirements. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 . (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-1995) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | axc14 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | hbn1 | ||
2 | dveel2 | ||
3 | 1 2 | hbim1 | |
4 | elequ1 | ||
5 | 4 | imbi2d | |
6 | 3 5 | dvelim | |
7 | nfa1 | ||
8 | 7 | nfn | |
9 | 8 | 19.21 | |
10 | 6 9 | syl6ib | |
11 | 10 | pm2.86d |