Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem cdlemb3

Description: Given two atoms not under the fiducial co-atom W , there is a third. Lemma B in Crawley p. 112. TODO: Is there a simpler more direct proof, that could be placed earlier e.g. near lhpexle ? Then replace cdlemb2 with it. This is a more general version of cdlemb2 without P =/= Q condition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2013)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses cdlemg5.l ⊢ ≤ ˙ = ≤ K
cdlemg5.j ⊢ ∨ ˙ = join ⁡ K
cdlemg5.a ⊢ A = Atoms ⁡ K
cdlemg5.h ⊢ H = LHyp ⁡ K
Assertion cdlemb3 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W → ∃ r ∈ A ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 cdlemg5.l ⊢ ≤ ˙ = ≤ K
2 cdlemg5.j ⊢ ∨ ˙ = join ⁡ K
3 cdlemg5.a ⊢ A = Atoms ⁡ K
4 cdlemg5.h ⊢ H = LHyp ⁡ K
5 simpl1 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q → K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H
6 simpl2 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q → P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W
7 1 2 3 4 cdlemg5 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W → ∃ r ∈ A P ≠ r ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W
8 5 6 7 syl2anc ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q → ∃ r ∈ A P ≠ r ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W
9 ancom ⊢ P ≠ r ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ↔ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ P ≠ r
10 eqcom ⊢ P = r ↔ r = P
11 simp2 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P = Q
12 11 oveq2d ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P ∨ ˙ P = P ∨ ˙ Q
13 simp11l ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → K ∈ HL
14 simp12l ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P ∈ A
15 2 3 hlatjidm ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ P ∈ A → P ∨ ˙ P = P
16 13 14 15 syl2anc ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P ∨ ˙ P = P
17 12 16 eqtr3d ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P ∨ ˙ Q = P
18 17 breq2d ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q ↔ r ≤ ˙ P
19 hlatl ⊢ K ∈ HL → K ∈ AtLat
20 13 19 syl ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → K ∈ AtLat
21 simp3 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → r ∈ A
22 1 3 atcmp ⊢ K ∈ AtLat ∧ r ∈ A ∧ P ∈ A → r ≤ ˙ P ↔ r = P
23 20 21 14 22 syl3anc ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → r ≤ ˙ P ↔ r = P
24 18 23 bitr2d ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → r = P ↔ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
25 10 24 bitrid ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P = r ↔ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
26 25 necon3abid ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P ≠ r ↔ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
27 26 anbi2d ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ P ≠ r ↔ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
28 9 27 bitrid ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P ≠ r ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ↔ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
29 28 3expa ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q ∧ r ∈ A → P ≠ r ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ↔ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
30 29 rexbidva ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q → ∃ r ∈ A P ≠ r ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ↔ ∃ r ∈ A ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
31 8 30 mpbid ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P = Q → ∃ r ∈ A ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
32 simpl1 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P ≠ Q → K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H
33 simpl2 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P ≠ Q → P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W
34 simpl3 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P ≠ Q → Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W
35 simpr ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P ≠ Q → P ≠ Q
36 1 2 3 4 cdlemb2 ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P ≠ Q → ∃ r ∈ A ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
37 32 33 34 35 36 syl121anc ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W ∧ P ≠ Q → ∃ r ∈ A ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q
38 31 37 pm2.61dane ⊢ K ∈ HL ∧ W ∈ H ∧ P ∈ A ∧ ¬ P ≤ ˙ W ∧ Q ∈ A ∧ ¬ Q ≤ ˙ W → ∃ r ∈ A ¬ r ≤ ˙ W ∧ ¬ r ≤ ˙ P ∨ ˙ Q