Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ex-fl

Description: Example for df-fl . Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015)

Ref Expression
Assertion ex-fl ⊢ 3 2 = 1 ∧ − 3 2 = − 2

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 1re ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
2 3re ⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ
3 2 rehalfcli ⊢ 3 2 ∈ ℝ
4 2cn ⊢ 2 ∈ ℂ
5 4 mullidi ⊢ 1 ⋅ 2 = 2
6 2lt3 ⊢ 2 < 3
7 5 6 eqbrtri ⊢ 1 ⋅ 2 < 3
8 2pos ⊢ 0 < 2
9 2re ⊢ 2 ∈ ℝ
10 1 2 9 ltmuldivi ⊢ 0 < 2 → 1 ⋅ 2 < 3 ↔ 1 < 3 2
11 8 10 ax-mp ⊢ 1 ⋅ 2 < 3 ↔ 1 < 3 2
12 7 11 mpbi ⊢ 1 < 3 2
13 1 3 12 ltleii ⊢ 1 ≤ 3 2
14 3lt4 ⊢ 3 < 4
15 2t2e4 ⊢ 2 ⋅ 2 = 4
16 14 15 breqtrri ⊢ 3 < 2 ⋅ 2
17 9 8 pm3.2i ⊢ 2 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 2
18 ltdivmul ⊢ 3 ∈ ℝ ∧ 2 ∈ ℝ ∧ 2 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 2 → 3 2 < 2 ↔ 3 < 2 ⋅ 2
19 2 9 17 18 mp3an ⊢ 3 2 < 2 ↔ 3 < 2 ⋅ 2
20 16 19 mpbir ⊢ 3 2 < 2
21 df-2 ⊢ 2 = 1 + 1
22 20 21 breqtri ⊢ 3 2 < 1 + 1
23 1z ⊢ 1 ∈ ℤ
24 flbi ⊢ 3 2 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℤ → 3 2 = 1 ↔ 1 ≤ 3 2 ∧ 3 2 < 1 + 1
25 3 23 24 mp2an ⊢ 3 2 = 1 ↔ 1 ≤ 3 2 ∧ 3 2 < 1 + 1
26 13 22 25 mpbir2an ⊢ 3 2 = 1
27 9 renegcli ⊢ − 2 ∈ ℝ
28 3 renegcli ⊢ − 3 2 ∈ ℝ
29 3 9 ltnegi ⊢ 3 2 < 2 ↔ − 2 < − 3 2
30 20 29 mpbi ⊢ − 2 < − 3 2
31 27 28 30 ltleii ⊢ − 2 ≤ − 3 2
32 4 negcli ⊢ − 2 ∈ ℂ
33 ax-1cn ⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
34 negdi2 ⊢ − 2 ∈ ℂ ∧ 1 ∈ ℂ → − - 2 + 1 = - -2 - 1
35 32 33 34 mp2an ⊢ − - 2 + 1 = - -2 - 1
36 4 negnegi ⊢ − -2 = 2
37 36 oveq1i ⊢ - -2 - 1 = 2 − 1
38 35 37 eqtri ⊢ − - 2 + 1 = 2 − 1
39 2m1e1 ⊢ 2 − 1 = 1
40 39 12 eqbrtri ⊢ 2 − 1 < 3 2
41 38 40 eqbrtri ⊢ − - 2 + 1 < 3 2
42 27 1 readdcli ⊢ - 2 + 1 ∈ ℝ
43 42 3 ltnegcon1i ⊢ − - 2 + 1 < 3 2 ↔ − 3 2 < - 2 + 1
44 41 43 mpbi ⊢ − 3 2 < - 2 + 1
45 2z ⊢ 2 ∈ ℤ
46 znegcl ⊢ 2 ∈ ℤ → − 2 ∈ ℤ
47 45 46 ax-mp ⊢ − 2 ∈ ℤ
48 flbi ⊢ − 3 2 ∈ ℝ ∧ − 2 ∈ ℤ → − 3 2 = − 2 ↔ − 2 ≤ − 3 2 ∧ − 3 2 < - 2 + 1
49 28 47 48 mp2an ⊢ − 3 2 = − 2 ↔ − 2 ≤ − 3 2 ∧ − 3 2 < - 2 + 1
50 31 44 49 mpbir2an ⊢ − 3 2 = − 2
51 26 50 pm3.2i ⊢ 3 2 = 1 ∧ − 3 2 = − 2