Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem liminflelimsupcex

Description: A counterexample for liminflelimsup , showing that the second hypothesis is needed. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022)

Ref Expression
Assertion liminflelimsupcex ⊢ lim sup ⁡ ∅ < lim inf ⁡ ∅

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 mnfltpnf ⊢ −∞ < +∞
2 limsup0 ⊢ lim sup ⁡ ∅ = −∞
3 liminf0 ⊢ lim inf ⁡ ∅ = +∞
4 2 3 breq12i ⊢ lim sup ⁡ ∅ < lim inf ⁡ ∅ ↔ −∞ < +∞
5 1 4 mpbir ⊢ lim sup ⁡ ∅ < lim inf ⁡ ∅