Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem limsupval4

Description: Alternate definition of liminf when the given a function is eventually extended real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses limsupval4.x ⊢ Ⅎ x φ
limsupval4.a ⊢ φ → A ∈ V
limsupval4.m ⊢ φ → M ∈ ℝ
limsupval4.b ⊢ φ ∧ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ → B ∈ ℝ *
Assertion limsupval4 ⊢ φ → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ B = − lim inf ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − B

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 limsupval4.x ⊢ Ⅎ x φ
2 limsupval4.a ⊢ φ → A ∈ V
3 limsupval4.m ⊢ φ → M ∈ ℝ
4 limsupval4.b ⊢ φ ∧ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ → B ∈ ℝ *
5 ovex ⊢ M +∞ ∈ V
6 5 inex2 ⊢ A ∩ M +∞ ∈ V
7 6 mptex ⊢ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B ∈ V
8 limsupcl ⊢ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B ∈ V → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B ∈ ℝ *
9 7 8 ax-mp ⊢ lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B ∈ ℝ *
10 9 a1i ⊢ φ → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B ∈ ℝ *
11 10 xnegnegd ⊢ φ → − − lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B = lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
12 11 eqcomd ⊢ φ → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B = − − lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
13 eqid ⊢ M +∞ = M +∞
14 2 3 13 limsupresicompt ⊢ φ → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ B = lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
15 4 xnegcld ⊢ φ ∧ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ → − B ∈ ℝ *
16 1 2 3 15 liminfval3 ⊢ φ → lim inf ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − B = − lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − − B
17 2 3 13 limsupresicompt ⊢ φ → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − − B = lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ − − B
18 4 xnegnegd ⊢ φ ∧ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ → − − B = B
19 1 18 mpteq2da ⊢ φ → x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ − − B = x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
20 19 fveq2d ⊢ φ → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ − − B = lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
21 17 20 eqtrd ⊢ φ → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − − B = lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
22 21 xnegeqd ⊢ φ → − lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − − B = − lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
23 16 22 eqtrd ⊢ φ → lim inf ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − B = − lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
24 23 xnegeqd ⊢ φ → − lim inf ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − B = − − lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ∩ M +∞ ⟼ B
25 12 14 24 3eqtr4d ⊢ φ → lim sup ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ B = − lim inf ⁡ x ∈ A ⟼ − B