Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rexanuz2nf

Description: A simple counterexample related to theorem rexanuz2 , demonstrating the necessity of its disjoint variable constraints. Here, j appears free in ph , showing that without these constraints, rexanuz2 and similar theorems would not hold (see rexanre and rexanuz ). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 15-Feb-2025)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses rexanuz2nf.1 ⊢ Z = ℕ 0
rexanuz2nf.2 ⊢ φ ↔ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
rexanuz2nf.3 ⊢ ψ ↔ 0 < k
Assertion rexanuz2nf ⊢ ¬ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ ↔ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 rexanuz2nf.1 ⊢ Z = ℕ 0
2 rexanuz2nf.2 ⊢ φ ↔ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
3 rexanuz2nf.3 ⊢ ψ ↔ 0 < k
4 0nn0 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℕ 0
5 nn0ge0 ⊢ k ∈ ℕ 0 → 0 ≤ k
6 5 rgen ⊢ ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 0 ≤ k
7 fveq2 ⊢ j = 0 → ℤ ≥ j = ℤ ≥ 0
8 nn0uz ⊢ ℕ 0 = ℤ ≥ 0
9 7 8 eqtr4di ⊢ j = 0 → ℤ ≥ j = ℕ 0
10 9 raleqdv ⊢ j = 0 → ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k ↔ ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
11 5 ad2antlr ⊢ j = 0 ∧ k ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k → 0 ≤ k
12 simpll ⊢ j = 0 ∧ k ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ k → j = 0
13 simpr ⊢ j = 0 ∧ k ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ k → 0 ≤ k
14 12 13 eqbrtrd ⊢ j = 0 ∧ k ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ k → j ≤ k
15 12 14 jca ⊢ j = 0 ∧ k ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ k → j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
16 11 15 impbida ⊢ j = 0 ∧ k ∈ ℕ 0 → j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k ↔ 0 ≤ k
17 16 ralbidva ⊢ j = 0 → ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k ↔ ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 0 ≤ k
18 10 17 bitrd ⊢ j = 0 → ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k ↔ ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 0 ≤ k
19 18 rspcev ⊢ 0 ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 0 ≤ k → ∃ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
20 4 6 19 mp2an ⊢ ∃ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
21 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ _ j ℕ 0
22 1 21 nfcxfr ⊢ Ⅎ _ j Z
23 22 21 1 rexeqif ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k ↔ ∃ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
24 20 23 mpbir ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
25 2 ralbii ⊢ ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ↔ ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
26 25 rexbii ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ↔ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k
27 24 26 mpbir ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ
28 1nn0 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ 0
29 nngt0 ⊢ k ∈ ℕ → 0 < k
30 29 rgen ⊢ ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 < k
31 fveq2 ⊢ j = 1 → ℤ ≥ j = ℤ ≥ 1
32 nnuz ⊢ ℕ = ℤ ≥ 1
33 31 32 eqtr4di ⊢ j = 1 → ℤ ≥ j = ℕ
34 33 raleqdv ⊢ j = 1 → ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j 0 < k ↔ ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 < k
35 34 rspcev ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ ∀ k ∈ ℕ 0 < k → ∃ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j 0 < k
36 28 30 35 mp2an ⊢ ∃ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j 0 < k
37 22 21 1 rexeqif ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j 0 < k ↔ ∃ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j 0 < k
38 36 37 mpbir ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j 0 < k
39 3 ralbii ⊢ ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ ↔ ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j 0 < k
40 39 rexbii ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ ↔ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j 0 < k
41 38 40 mpbir ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ
42 27 41 pm3.2i ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ
43 nfv ⊢ Ⅎ k ¬ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j ∧ 0 < j
44 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ _ k j
45 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ _ k ℤ ≥ j
46 8 uzid3 ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 → j ∈ ℤ ≥ j
47 46 adantr ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ j = 0 → j ∈ ℤ ≥ j
48 0re ⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ
49 48 ltnri ⊢ ¬ 0 < 0
50 49 a1i ⊢ j = 0 → ¬ 0 < 0
51 eqcom ⊢ j = 0 ↔ 0 = j
52 51 biimpi ⊢ j = 0 → 0 = j
53 50 52 brneqtrd ⊢ j = 0 → ¬ 0 < j
54 53 intnand ⊢ j = 0 → ¬ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j ∧ 0 < j
55 54 adantl ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ j = 0 → ¬ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j ∧ 0 < j
56 breq2 ⊢ k = j → j ≤ k ↔ j ≤ j
57 56 anbi2d ⊢ k = j → j = 0 ∧ j ≤ k ↔ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j
58 2 57 bitrid ⊢ k = j → φ ↔ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j
59 breq2 ⊢ k = j → 0 < k ↔ 0 < j
60 3 59 bitrid ⊢ k = j → ψ ↔ 0 < j
61 58 60 anbi12d ⊢ k = j → φ ∧ ψ ↔ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j ∧ 0 < j
62 61 notbid ⊢ k = j → ¬ φ ∧ ψ ↔ ¬ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j ∧ 0 < j
63 43 44 45 47 55 62 rspced ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ j = 0 → ∃ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ¬ φ ∧ ψ
64 46 adantr ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ ¬ j = 0 → j ∈ ℤ ≥ j
65 id ⊢ ¬ j = 0 → ¬ j = 0
66 65 intnanrd ⊢ ¬ j = 0 → ¬ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j
67 66 intnanrd ⊢ ¬ j = 0 → ¬ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j ∧ 0 < j
68 67 adantl ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ ¬ j = 0 → ¬ j = 0 ∧ j ≤ j ∧ 0 < j
69 43 44 45 64 68 62 rspced ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∧ ¬ j = 0 → ∃ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ¬ φ ∧ ψ
70 63 69 pm2.61dan ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 → ∃ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ¬ φ ∧ ψ
71 rexnal ⊢ ∃ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ¬ φ ∧ ψ ↔ ¬ ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ
72 70 71 sylib ⊢ j ∈ ℕ 0 → ¬ ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ
73 72 nrex ⊢ ¬ ∃ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ
74 22 21 1 rexeqif ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ ↔ ∃ j ∈ ℕ 0 ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ
75 73 74 mtbir ⊢ ¬ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ
76 42 75 pm3.2i ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ ∧ ¬ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ
77 annim ⊢ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ ∧ ¬ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ ↔ ¬ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ → ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ
78 76 77 mpbi ⊢ ¬ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ → ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ
79 78 nimnbi2 ⊢ ¬ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ψ ↔ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j φ ∧ ∃ j ∈ Z ∀ k ∈ ℤ ≥ j ψ