Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem 2mo2

Description: Two ways of expressing "there exists at most one ordered pair <. x , y >. such that ph ( x , y ) holds. Note that this is not equivalent to E* x E* y ph . See also 2mo . This is the analogue of 2eu4 for existential uniqueness. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 26-Oct-2019) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2023)

Ref Expression
Assertion 2mo2 ( ( ∃* 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃* 𝑦 ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 exdistrv ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑤 ( ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) ↔ ( ∃ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )
2 jcab ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) ↔ ( ( 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )
3 2 2albii ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( ( 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )
4 19.26-2 ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( ( 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) ↔ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )
5 19.23v ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ↔ ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) )
6 5 albii ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) )
7 alcom ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) )
8 19.23v ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ↔ ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) )
9 8 albii ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑦 ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) )
10 7 9 bitri ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) )
11 6 10 anbi12i ⊢ ( ( ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) ↔ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )
12 3 4 11 3bitri ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) ↔ ( ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )
13 12 2exbii ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) ↔ ∃ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑤 ( ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )
14 dfmo ⊢ ( ∃* 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) )
15 dfmo ⊢ ( ∃* 𝑦 ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 ↔ ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) )
16 14 15 anbi12i ⊢ ( ( ∃* 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃* 𝑦 ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ↔ ( ∃ 𝑧 ∀ 𝑥 ( ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧 ) ∧ ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑦 ( ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 → 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )
17 1 13 16 3bitr4ri ⊢ ( ( ∃* 𝑥 ∃ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃* 𝑦 ∃ 𝑥 𝜑 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑧 ∃ 𝑤 ∀ 𝑥 ∀ 𝑦 ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤 ) ) )