Metamath Proof Explorer
Description: Disjoin antecedents and consequents of three premises. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Jul-2026)
|
|
Ref |
Expression |
|
Hypotheses |
3orim123da.1 |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂 ) ) |
|
|
3orim123da.2 |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ) → 𝜒 ) |
|
|
3orim123da.3 |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ) → 𝜏 ) |
|
|
3orim123da.4 |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜂 ) → 𝜁 ) |
|
Assertion |
3orim123da |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁 ) ) |
Proof
| Step |
Hyp |
Ref |
Expression |
| 1 |
|
3orim123da.1 |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂 ) ) |
| 2 |
|
3orim123da.2 |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ) → 𝜒 ) |
| 3 |
|
3orim123da.3 |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ) → 𝜏 ) |
| 4 |
|
3orim123da.4 |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜂 ) → 𝜁 ) |
| 5 |
2
|
ex |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) ) |
| 6 |
3
|
ex |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜃 → 𝜏 ) ) |
| 7 |
4
|
ex |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜂 → 𝜁 ) ) |
| 8 |
5 6 7
|
3orim123d |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂 ) → ( 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁 ) ) ) |
| 9 |
1 8
|
mpd |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏 ∨ 𝜁 ) ) |