Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem 3pthd

Description: A path of length 3 from one vertex to another vertex via a third vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Dec-2017) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses 3wlkd.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩
3wlkd.f ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩
3wlkd.s ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ) ∧ ( 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 ) ) )
3wlkd.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ) ∧ ( 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ) )
3wlkd.e ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( { 𝐴 , 𝐵 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐽 ) ∧ { 𝐵 , 𝐶 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐾 ) ∧ { 𝐶 , 𝐷 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐿 ) ) )
3wlkd.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Vtx ‘ 𝐺 )
3wlkd.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( iEdg ‘ 𝐺 )
3trld.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿 ) )
Assertion 3pthd ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Paths ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 3wlkd.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩
2 3wlkd.f ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩
3 3wlkd.s ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ) ∧ ( 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 ) ) )
4 3wlkd.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ) ∧ ( 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ) )
5 3wlkd.e ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( { 𝐴 , 𝐵 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐽 ) ∧ { 𝐵 , 𝐶 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐾 ) ∧ { 𝐶 , 𝐷 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐿 ) ) )
6 3wlkd.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Vtx ‘ 𝐺 )
7 3wlkd.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( iEdg ‘ 𝐺 )
8 3trld.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿 ) )
9 s4cli ⊢ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ ∈ Word V
10 1 9 eqeltri ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ Word V
11 10 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V )
12 2 fveq2i ⊢ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐹 ) = ( ♯ ‘ ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩ )
13 s3len ⊢ ( ♯ ‘ ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩ ) = 3
14 12 13 eqtri ⊢ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐹 ) = 3
15 4m1e3 ⊢ ( 4 − 1 ) = 3
16 1 fveq2i ⊢ ( ♯ ‘ 𝑃 ) = ( ♯ ‘ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ )
17 s4len ⊢ ( ♯ ‘ ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩ ) = 4
18 16 17 eqtr2i ⊢ 4 = ( ♯ ‘ 𝑃 )
19 18 oveq1i ⊢ ( 4 − 1 ) = ( ( ♯ ‘ 𝑃 ) − 1 )
20 14 15 19 3eqtr2i ⊢ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐹 ) = ( ( ♯ ‘ 𝑃 ) − 1 )
21 1 2 3 4 3pthdlem1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( 0 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝑃 ) ) ∀ 𝑗 ∈ ( 1 ..^ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐹 ) ) ( 𝑘 ≠ 𝑗 → ( 𝑃 ‘ 𝑘 ) ≠ ( 𝑃 ‘ 𝑗 ) ) )
22 eqid ⊢ ( ♯ ‘ 𝐹 ) = ( ♯ ‘ 𝐹 )
23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3trld ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Trails ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )
24 11 20 21 22 23 pthd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Paths ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )