Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem 3trld

Description: Construction of a trail from two given edges in a graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017) (Revised by AV, 8-Feb-2021) (Revised by AV, 24-Mar-2021) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses 3wlkd.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩
3wlkd.f ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩
3wlkd.s ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ) ∧ ( 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 ) ) )
3wlkd.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ) ∧ ( 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ) )
3wlkd.e ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( { 𝐴 , 𝐵 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐽 ) ∧ { 𝐵 , 𝐶 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐾 ) ∧ { 𝐶 , 𝐷 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐿 ) ) )
3wlkd.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Vtx ‘ 𝐺 )
3wlkd.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( iEdg ‘ 𝐺 )
3trld.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿 ) )
Assertion 3trld ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Trails ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 3wlkd.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“ 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 ”⟩
2 3wlkd.f ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩
3 3wlkd.s ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ) ∧ ( 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 ) ) )
4 3wlkd.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ) ∧ ( 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷 ) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ) )
5 3wlkd.e ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( { 𝐴 , 𝐵 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐽 ) ∧ { 𝐵 , 𝐶 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐾 ) ∧ { 𝐶 , 𝐷 } ⊆ ( 𝐼 ‘ 𝐿 ) ) )
6 3wlkd.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Vtx ‘ 𝐺 )
7 3wlkd.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( iEdg ‘ 𝐺 )
8 3trld.n ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿 ) )
9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3wlkd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Walks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )
10 1 2 3 4 5 3wlkdlem7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐽 ∈ V ∧ 𝐾 ∈ V ∧ 𝐿 ∈ V ) )
11 funcnvs3 ⊢ ( ( ( 𝐽 ∈ V ∧ 𝐾 ∈ V ∧ 𝐿 ∈ V ) ∧ ( 𝐽 ≠ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐽 ≠ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐾 ≠ 𝐿 ) ) → Fun ◡ ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩ )
12 10 8 11 syl2anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Fun ◡ ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩ )
13 2 cnveqi ⊢ ◡ 𝐹 = ◡ ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩
14 13 funeqi ⊢ ( Fun ◡ 𝐹 ↔ Fun ◡ ⟨“ 𝐽 𝐾 𝐿 ”⟩ )
15 12 14 sylibr ⊢ ( 𝜑 → Fun ◡ 𝐹 )
16 istrl ⊢ ( 𝐹 ( Trails ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ↔ ( 𝐹 ( Walks ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡ 𝐹 ) )
17 9 15 16 sylanbrc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ( Trails ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝑃 )