Metamath Proof Explorer
Description: Variant of anim12d where the second implication does not depend on the
antecedent. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010)
|
|
Ref |
Expression |
|
Hypotheses |
anim12d1.1 |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) ) |
|
|
anim12d1.2 |
⊢ ( 𝜃 → 𝜏 ) |
|
Assertion |
anim12d1 |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ) → ( 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ) ) ) |
Proof
Step |
Hyp |
Ref |
Expression |
1 |
|
anim12d1.1 |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜓 → 𝜒 ) ) |
2 |
|
anim12d1.2 |
⊢ ( 𝜃 → 𝜏 ) |
3 |
2
|
a1i |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝜃 → 𝜏 ) ) |
4 |
1 3
|
anim12d |
⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ) → ( 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ) ) ) |