Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ax12v2-o

Description: Rederivation of ax-c15 from ax12v (without using ax-c15 or the full ax-12 ). Thus, the hypothesis ( ax12v ) provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-c15 . See also axc15 . (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis ax12v2-o.1 ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝜑 ) ) )
Assertion ax12v2-o ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ax12v2-o.1 ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝜑 ) ) )
2 ax6ev 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
3 equequ2 ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )
4 3 adantl ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑦 ) )
5 dveeq2-o ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀ 𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 ) )
6 5 imp ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 )
7 nfa1-o 𝑥𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦
8 3 imbi1d ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ( ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝜑 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) )
9 8 sps-o ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ( ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝜑 ) ↔ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) )
10 7 9 albid ( ∀ 𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝜑 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) )
11 6 10 syl ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝜑 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) )
12 11 imbi2d ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝜑 ) ) ↔ ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) ) )
13 4 12 imbi12d ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( ( 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑧𝜑 ) ) ) ↔ ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) ) ) )
14 1 13 mpbii ( ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦𝑧 = 𝑦 ) → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) ) )
15 14 ex ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) ) ) )
16 15 exlimdv ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( ∃ 𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) ) ) )
17 2 16 mpi ( ¬ ∀ 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝑦𝜑 ) ) ) )