Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj1047

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj1047.1 ⊢ ( 𝜌 ↔ ∀ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖 → [ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 ) )
bnj1047.2 ⊢ ( 𝜂′ ↔ [ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 )
Assertion bnj1047 ( 𝜌 ↔ ∀ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖 → 𝜂′ ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj1047.1 ⊢ ( 𝜌 ↔ ∀ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖 → [ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 ) )
2 bnj1047.2 ⊢ ( 𝜂′ ↔ [ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 )
3 2 imbi2i ⊢ ( ( 𝑗 E 𝑖 → 𝜂′ ) ↔ ( 𝑗 E 𝑖 → [ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 ) )
4 3 ralbii ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖 → 𝜂′ ) ↔ ∀ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖 → [ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 ) )
5 1 4 bitr4i ⊢ ( 𝜌 ↔ ∀ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖 → 𝜂′ ) )