Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj1047

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj1047.1 ( 𝜌 ↔ ∀ 𝑗𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖[ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 ) )
bnj1047.2 ( 𝜂′[ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 )
Assertion bnj1047 ( 𝜌 ↔ ∀ 𝑗𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖𝜂′ ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj1047.1 ( 𝜌 ↔ ∀ 𝑗𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖[ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 ) )
2 bnj1047.2 ( 𝜂′[ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 )
3 2 imbi2i ( ( 𝑗 E 𝑖𝜂′ ) ↔ ( 𝑗 E 𝑖[ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 ) )
4 3 ralbii ( ∀ 𝑗𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖𝜂′ ) ↔ ∀ 𝑗𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖[ 𝑗 / 𝑖 ] 𝜂 ) )
5 1 4 bitr4i ( 𝜌 ↔ ∀ 𝑗𝑛 ( 𝑗 E 𝑖𝜂′ ) )