Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem bnj1083

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 . This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011) (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses bnj1083.3 ( 𝜒 ↔ ( 𝑛𝐷𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) )
bnj1083.8 𝐾 = { 𝑓 ∣ ∃ 𝑛𝐷 ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) }
Assertion bnj1083 ( 𝑓𝐾 ↔ ∃ 𝑛 𝜒 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 bnj1083.3 ( 𝜒 ↔ ( 𝑛𝐷𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) )
2 bnj1083.8 𝐾 = { 𝑓 ∣ ∃ 𝑛𝐷 ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) }
3 df-rex ( ∃ 𝑛𝐷 ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑛 ( 𝑛𝐷 ∧ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) ) )
4 2 abeq2i ( 𝑓𝐾 ↔ ∃ 𝑛𝐷 ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) )
5 bnj252 ( ( 𝑛𝐷𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) ↔ ( 𝑛𝐷 ∧ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) ) )
6 1 5 bitri ( 𝜒 ↔ ( 𝑛𝐷 ∧ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) ) )
7 6 exbii ( ∃ 𝑛 𝜒 ↔ ∃ 𝑛 ( 𝑛𝐷 ∧ ( 𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓 ) ) )
8 3 4 7 3bitr4i ( 𝑓𝐾 ↔ ∃ 𝑛 𝜒 )