Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ceqsal1t

Description: One direction of ceqsalt is based on fewer assumptions and fewer axioms. It is at the same time the reverse direction of vtoclgft . Extracted from a proof of ceqsalt . (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 25-Mar-2025)

Ref Expression
Assertion ceqsal1t ( ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) ) → ( 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 biimpr ( ( 𝜑𝜓 ) → ( 𝜓𝜑 ) )
2 1 imim2i ( ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜓𝜑 ) ) )
3 2 com23 ( ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ( 𝜓 → ( 𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑 ) ) )
4 3 alimi ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜓 → ( 𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑 ) ) )
5 19.21t ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝜓 → ( 𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑 ) ) ↔ ( 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑 ) ) ) )
6 4 5 imbitrid ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) → ( 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑 ) ) ) )
7 6 imp ( ( Ⅎ 𝑥 𝜓 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ( 𝜑𝜓 ) ) ) → ( 𝜓 → ∀ 𝑥 ( 𝑥 = 𝐴𝜑 ) ) )