Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem clim2cf

Description: Express the predicate F converges to A . Similar to clim2 , but without the disjoint var constraint F k . (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses clim2cf.nf ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 𝐹
clim2cf.z ⊢ 𝑍 = ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 )
clim2cf.m ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ )
clim2cf.f ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 )
clim2cf.fv ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑘 ) = 𝐵 )
clim2cf.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ )
clim2cf.b ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )
Assertion clim2cf ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 clim2cf.nf ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑘 𝐹
2 clim2cf.z ⊢ 𝑍 = ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 )
3 clim2cf.m ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ )
4 clim2cf.f ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 )
5 clim2cf.fv ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑘 ) = 𝐵 )
6 clim2cf.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ )
7 clim2cf.b ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ )
8 6 biantrurd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ↔ ( 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ) ) )
9 2 uztrn2 ⊢ ( ( 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ) → 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 )
10 7 biantrurd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ↔ ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ) )
11 9 10 sylan2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ) ) → ( ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ↔ ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ) )
12 11 anassrs ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ) → ( ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ↔ ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ) )
13 12 ralbidva ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ) → ( ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ↔ ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ) )
14 13 rexbidva ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ↔ ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ) )
15 14 ralbidv ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ) )
16 1 2 3 4 5 clim2f ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ( 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) ) ) )
17 8 15 16 3bitr4rd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀ 𝑘 ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑗 ) ( abs ‘ ( 𝐵 − 𝐴 ) ) < 𝑥 ) )