Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem dalemsly

Description: Lemma for dath . Frequently-used utility lemma. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2012)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses dalema.ph ⊢ ( 𝜑 ↔ ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ) ) ∧ ( 𝑌 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑂 ) ∧ ( ( ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑄 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑃 ) ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑆 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑇 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑈 ∨ 𝑆 ) ) ∧ ( 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑆 ) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑄 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑈 ) ) ) ) )
dalemc.l ⊢ ≤ = ( le ‘ 𝐾 )
dalemc.j ⊢ ∨ = ( join ‘ 𝐾 )
dalemc.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( Atoms ‘ 𝐾 )
dalemsly.z ⊢ 𝑍 = ( ( 𝑆 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∨ 𝑈 )
Assertion dalemsly ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) → 𝑆 ≤ 𝑌 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 dalema.ph ⊢ ( 𝜑 ↔ ( ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) ) ∧ ( 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ) ∧ ( 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ) ) ∧ ( 𝑌 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑂 ) ∧ ( ( ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 ) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑄 ∨ 𝑅 ) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑃 ) ) ∧ ( ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑆 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑇 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑈 ∨ 𝑆 ) ) ∧ ( 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑃 ∨ 𝑆 ) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑄 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∧ 𝐶 ≤ ( 𝑅 ∨ 𝑈 ) ) ) ) )
2 dalemc.l ⊢ ≤ = ( le ‘ 𝐾 )
3 dalemc.j ⊢ ∨ = ( join ‘ 𝐾 )
4 dalemc.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( Atoms ‘ 𝐾 )
5 dalemsly.z ⊢ 𝑍 = ( ( 𝑆 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∨ 𝑈 )
6 1 dalemkelat ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Lat )
7 1 4 dalemseb ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) )
8 1 3 4 dalemtjueb ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑇 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∈ ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) )
9 eqid ⊢ ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) = ( Base ‘ 𝐾 )
10 9 2 3 latlej1 ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) ∧ ( 𝑇 ∨ 𝑈 ) ∈ ( Base ‘ 𝐾 ) ) → 𝑆 ≤ ( 𝑆 ∨ ( 𝑇 ∨ 𝑈 ) ) )
11 6 7 8 10 syl3anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑆 ≤ ( 𝑆 ∨ ( 𝑇 ∨ 𝑈 ) ) )
12 1 dalemkehl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ HL )
13 1 dalemsea ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 )
14 1 dalemtea ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 )
15 1 dalemuea ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 )
16 3 4 hlatjass ⊢ ( ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ( 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ) ) → ( ( 𝑆 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∨ 𝑈 ) = ( 𝑆 ∨ ( 𝑇 ∨ 𝑈 ) ) )
17 12 13 14 15 16 syl13anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑆 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∨ 𝑈 ) = ( 𝑆 ∨ ( 𝑇 ∨ 𝑈 ) ) )
18 11 17 breqtrrd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑆 ≤ ( ( 𝑆 ∨ 𝑇 ) ∨ 𝑈 ) )
19 18 5 breqtrrdi ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑆 ≤ 𝑍 )
20 19 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) → 𝑆 ≤ 𝑍 )
21 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) → 𝑌 = 𝑍 )
22 20 21 breqtrrd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 = 𝑍 ) → 𝑆 ≤ 𝑌 )