Description: Membership in class intersection, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2003) (Proof shortened by JJ, 26-Jul-2021)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assertion | elintg | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( 𝐴 ∈ ∩ 𝐵 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ) ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | elequ1 | ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ( 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ) ) | |
2 | 1 | ralbidv | ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ) ) |
3 | eleq1 | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝐴 → ( 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ) ) | |
4 | 3 | ralbidv | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝐴 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ) ) |
5 | dfint2 | ⊢ ∩ 𝐵 = { 𝑧 ∣ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 } | |
6 | 2 4 5 | elab2gw | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( 𝐴 ∈ ∩ 𝐵 ↔ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ) ) |