Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem eulerpartleme

Description: Lemma for eulerpart . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2015)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis eulerpart.p ⊢ 𝑃 = { 𝑓 ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m ℕ ) ∣ ( ( ◡ 𝑓 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) }
Assertion eulerpartleme ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 ↔ ( 𝐴 : ℕ ⟶ ℕ0 ∧ ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 eulerpart.p ⊢ 𝑃 = { 𝑓 ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m ℕ ) ∣ ( ( ◡ 𝑓 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) }
2 nn0ex ⊢ ℕ0 ∈ V
3 nnex ⊢ ℕ ∈ V
4 2 3 elmap ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m ℕ ) ↔ 𝐴 : ℕ ⟶ ℕ0 )
5 4 anbi1i ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m ℕ ) ∧ ( ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) ) ↔ ( 𝐴 : ℕ ⟶ ℕ0 ∧ ( ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) ) )
6 cnveq ⊢ ( 𝑓 = 𝐴 → ◡ 𝑓 = ◡ 𝐴 )
7 6 imaeq1d ⊢ ( 𝑓 = 𝐴 → ( ◡ 𝑓 “ ℕ ) = ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) )
8 7 eleq1d ⊢ ( 𝑓 = 𝐴 → ( ( ◡ 𝑓 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ↔ ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ) )
9 fveq1 ⊢ ( 𝑓 = 𝐴 → ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) = ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) )
10 9 oveq1d ⊢ ( 𝑓 = 𝐴 → ( ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) )
11 10 sumeq2sdv ⊢ ( 𝑓 = 𝐴 → Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) )
12 11 eqeq1d ⊢ ( 𝑓 = 𝐴 → ( Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ↔ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) )
13 8 12 anbi12d ⊢ ( 𝑓 = 𝐴 → ( ( ( ◡ 𝑓 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝑓 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) ↔ ( ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) ) )
14 13 1 elrab2 ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 ↔ ( 𝐴 ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m ℕ ) ∧ ( ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) ) )
15 3anass ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 : ℕ ⟶ ℕ0 ∧ ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) ↔ ( 𝐴 : ℕ ⟶ ℕ0 ∧ ( ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) ) )
16 5 14 15 3bitr4i ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 ↔ ( 𝐴 : ℕ ⟶ ℕ0 ∧ ( ◡ 𝐴 “ ℕ ) ∈ Fin ∧ Σ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ ( ( 𝐴 ‘ 𝑘 ) · 𝑘 ) = 𝑁 ) )