Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem fin33i

Description: Inference from isfin3-3 . (This is actually a bit stronger than isfin3-3 because it does not assume F is a set and does not use the Axiom of Infinity either.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015)

Ref Expression
Assertion fin33i ( ( 𝐴 ∈ FinIII𝐹 : ω ⟶ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) ) → ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 isfin32i ( 𝐴 ∈ FinIII → ¬ ω ≼* 𝐴 )
2 1 3ad2ant1 ( ( 𝐴 ∈ FinIII𝐹 : ω ⟶ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) ) → ¬ ω ≼* 𝐴 )
3 isf32lem11 ( ( 𝐴 ∈ FinIII ∧ ( 𝐹 : ω ⟶ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) ∧ ¬ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹 ) ) → ω ≼* 𝐴 )
4 3 3exp2 ( 𝐴 ∈ FinIII → ( 𝐹 : ω ⟶ 𝒫 𝐴 → ( ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) → ( ¬ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹 → ω ≼* 𝐴 ) ) ) )
5 4 3imp ( ( 𝐴 ∈ FinIII𝐹 : ω ⟶ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) ) → ( ¬ ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹 → ω ≼* 𝐴 ) )
6 2 5 mt3d ( ( 𝐴 ∈ FinIII𝐹 : ω ⟶ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ∀ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝐹 ‘ suc 𝑥 ) ⊆ ( 𝐹𝑥 ) ) → ran 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝐹 )