Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem grothomex

Description: The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom implies the Axiom of Infinity (in the form of omex ). Note that our proof depends on neither the Axiom of Infinity nor Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013) Use omex instead. (New usage is discouraged.)

Ref Expression
Assertion grothomex ω ∈ V

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 r111 ⊢ 𝑅1 : On –1-1→ V
2 omsson ⊢ ω ⊆ On
3 f1ores ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 : On –1-1→ V ∧ ω ⊆ On ) → ( 𝑅1 ↾ ω ) : ω –1-1-onto→ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) )
4 1 2 3 mp2an ⊢ ( 𝑅1 ↾ ω ) : ω –1-1-onto→ ( 𝑅1 “ ω )
5 f1of1 ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 ↾ ω ) : ω –1-1-onto→ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) → ( 𝑅1 ↾ ω ) : ω –1-1→ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) )
6 4 5 ax-mp ⊢ ( 𝑅1 ↾ ω ) : ω –1-1→ ( 𝑅1 “ ω )
7 r1fnon ⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
8 fvelimab ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 Fn On ∧ ω ⊆ On ) → ( 𝑤 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = 𝑤 ) )
9 7 2 8 mp2an ⊢ ( 𝑤 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ↔ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = 𝑤 )
10 fveq2 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( 𝑅1 ‘ ∅ ) )
11 10 eleq1d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑅1 ‘ ∅ ) ∈ 𝑦 ) )
12 fveq2 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑤 → ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) )
13 12 eleq1d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝑤 → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) )
14 fveq2 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = suc 𝑤 → ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) )
15 14 eleq1d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = suc 𝑤 → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) )
16 r10 ⊢ ( 𝑅1 ‘ ∅ ) = ∅
17 16 eleq1i ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ ∅ ) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝑦 )
18 17 biranri ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ( 𝑅1 ‘ ∅ ) ∈ 𝑦 )
19 pweq ⊢ ( 𝑧 = ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) → 𝒫 𝑧 = 𝒫 ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) )
20 19 eleq1d ⊢ ( 𝑧 = ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) → ( 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝒫 ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) )
21 20 rspccv ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 → 𝒫 ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) )
22 nnon ⊢ ( 𝑤 ∈ ω → 𝑤 ∈ On )
23 r1suc ⊢ ( 𝑤 ∈ On → ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) = 𝒫 ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) )
24 22 23 syl ⊢ ( 𝑤 ∈ ω → ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) = 𝒫 ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) )
25 24 eleq1d ⊢ ( 𝑤 ∈ ω → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝒫 ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) )
26 25 biimprcd ⊢ ( 𝒫 ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 → ( 𝑤 ∈ ω → ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) )
27 21 26 syl6 ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 → ( 𝑤 ∈ ω → ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
28 27 com3r ⊢ ( 𝑤 ∈ ω → ( ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 → ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
29 28 adantld ⊢ ( 𝑤 ∈ ω → ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 → ( 𝑅1 ‘ suc 𝑤 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
30 11 13 15 18 29 finds2 ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ω → ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝑦 ) )
31 eleq1 ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = 𝑤 → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
32 31 biimpd ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = 𝑤 → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) ∈ 𝑦 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
33 30 32 syl9 ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ ω → ( ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = 𝑤 → ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
34 33 rexlimiv ⊢ ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ ω ( 𝑅1 ‘ 𝑥 ) = 𝑤 → ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
35 9 34 sylbi ⊢ ( 𝑤 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) → ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
36 35 com12 ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ( 𝑤 ∈ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
37 36 ssrdv ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ⊆ 𝑦 )
38 vex ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
39 38 ssex ⊢ ( ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ⊆ 𝑦 → ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ∈ V )
40 37 39 syl ⊢ ( ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ∈ V )
41 0ex ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
42 eleq1 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ) )
43 42 anbi1d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ↔ ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
44 43 exbidv ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → ( ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ↔ ∃ 𝑦 ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) )
45 axgroth6 ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦 ( 𝑧 ≺ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
46 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
47 46 ralimi ⊢ ( ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) → ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
48 47 anim2i ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
49 48 3adant3 ⊢ ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ( 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦 ( 𝑧 ≺ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ) )
50 45 49 eximii ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
51 41 44 50 vtocl ⊢ ∃ 𝑦 ( ∅ ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
52 40 51 exlimiiv ⊢ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ∈ V
53 f1dmex ⊢ ( ( ( 𝑅1 ↾ ω ) : ω –1-1→ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ∧ ( 𝑅1 “ ω ) ∈ V ) → ω ∈ V )
54 6 52 53 mp2an ⊢ ω ∈ V