Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem lcfrlem21

Description: Lemma for lcfr . (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2015)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses lcfrlem17.h ⊢ 𝐻 = ( LHyp ‘ 𝐾 )
lcfrlem17.o ⊢ ⊥ = ( ( ocH ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 )
lcfrlem17.u ⊢ 𝑈 = ( ( DVecH ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 )
lcfrlem17.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Base ‘ 𝑈 )
lcfrlem17.p ⊢ + = ( +g ‘ 𝑈 )
lcfrlem17.z ⊢ 0 = ( 0g ‘ 𝑈 )
lcfrlem17.n ⊢ 𝑁 = ( LSpan ‘ 𝑈 )
lcfrlem17.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( LSAtoms ‘ 𝑈 )
lcfrlem17.k ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) )
lcfrlem17.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑉 ∖ { 0 } ) )
lcfrlem17.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑉 ∖ { 0 } ) )
lcfrlem17.ne ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 } ) ≠ ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 } ) )
Assertion lcfrlem21 ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) ∈ 𝐴 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 lcfrlem17.h ⊢ 𝐻 = ( LHyp ‘ 𝐾 )
2 lcfrlem17.o ⊢ ⊥ = ( ( ocH ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 )
3 lcfrlem17.u ⊢ 𝑈 = ( ( DVecH ‘ 𝐾 ) ‘ 𝑊 )
4 lcfrlem17.v ⊢ 𝑉 = ( Base ‘ 𝑈 )
5 lcfrlem17.p ⊢ + = ( +g ‘ 𝑈 )
6 lcfrlem17.z ⊢ 0 = ( 0g ‘ 𝑈 )
7 lcfrlem17.n ⊢ 𝑁 = ( LSpan ‘ 𝑈 )
8 lcfrlem17.a ⊢ 𝐴 = ( LSAtoms ‘ 𝑈 )
9 lcfrlem17.k ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) )
10 lcfrlem17.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑉 ∖ { 0 } ) )
11 lcfrlem17.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑉 ∖ { 0 } ) )
12 lcfrlem17.ne ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 } ) ≠ ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 } ) )
13 9 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) → ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) )
14 10 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) → 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑉 ∖ { 0 } ) )
15 11 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) → 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑉 ∖ { 0 } ) )
16 12 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) → ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 } ) ≠ ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 } ) )
17 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) )
18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 14 15 16 17 lcfrlem20 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) → ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) ∈ 𝐴 )
19 1 3 9 dvhlmod ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ LMod )
20 10 eldifad ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 )
21 11 eldifad ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 )
22 4 5 lmodcom ⊢ ( ( 𝑈 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ) → ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) = ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) )
23 19 20 21 22 syl3anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) = ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) )
24 23 sneqd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } = { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } )
25 24 fveq2d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) = ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) )
26 25 eleq2d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) )
27 26 biimprd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) → 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) )
28 27 con3dimp ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) )
29 prcom ⊢ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } = { 𝑌 , 𝑋 }
30 29 fveq2i ⊢ ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) = ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 , 𝑋 } )
31 30 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) = ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 , 𝑋 } ) )
32 31 25 ineq12d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) = ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 , 𝑋 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) )
33 32 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) → ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) = ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 , 𝑋 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) )
34 9 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) → ( 𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻 ) )
35 11 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) → 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑉 ∖ { 0 } ) )
36 10 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) → 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑉 ∖ { 0 } ) )
37 12 necomd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 } ) ≠ ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 } ) )
38 37 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) → ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 } ) ≠ ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 } ) )
39 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) )
40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 34 35 36 38 39 lcfrlem20 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) → ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑌 , 𝑋 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) ∈ 𝐴 )
41 33 40 eqeltrd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑌 + 𝑋 ) } ) ) → ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) ∈ 𝐴 )
42 28 41 syldan ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) → ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) ∈ 𝐴 )
43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 lcfrlem19 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ¬ 𝑋 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ∨ ¬ 𝑌 ∈ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) )
44 18 42 43 mpjaodan ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑁 ‘ { 𝑋 , 𝑌 } ) ∩ ( ⊥ ‘ { ( 𝑋 + 𝑌 ) } ) ) ∈ 𝐴 )