Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem lnrot1

Description: Rotating the points defining a line. Part of Theorem 4.11 of Schwabhauser p. 34. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses btwnlng1.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
btwnlng1.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
btwnlng1.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
btwnlng1.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
btwnlng1.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 )
btwnlng1.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 )
btwnlng1.z ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 )
btwnlng1.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 )
lnrot1.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑋 ) )
lnrot1.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋 )
Assertion lnrot1 ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐿 𝑌 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 btwnlng1.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 btwnlng1.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
3 btwnlng1.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
4 btwnlng1.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
5 btwnlng1.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 )
6 btwnlng1.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 )
7 btwnlng1.z ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 )
8 btwnlng1.d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 )
9 lnrot1.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑋 ) )
10 lnrot1.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ≠ 𝑋 )
11 eqid ⊢ ( dist ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
12 1 11 2 4 6 7 5 tgbtwncomb ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐼 𝑋 ) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐼 𝑌 ) ) )
13 biidd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ↔ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ) )
14 1 11 2 4 7 6 5 tgbtwncomb ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑋 ) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐼 𝑍 ) ) )
15 12 13 14 3orbi123d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑋 ) ) ↔ ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐼 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐼 𝑍 ) ) ) )
16 3orrot ⊢ ( ( 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ) ↔ ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑋 ) ) )
17 16 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ) ↔ ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑋 ) ) ) )
18 1 3 2 4 5 6 8 7 tgellng ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐿 𝑌 ) ↔ ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐼 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐼 𝑍 ) ) ) )
19 15 17 18 3bitr4rd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐿 𝑌 ) ↔ ( 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ) ) )
20 1 3 2 4 7 5 10 6 tgellng ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑋 ) ↔ ( 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑌 𝐼 𝑋 ) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐼 𝑌 ) ) ) )
21 19 20 bitr4d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐿 𝑌 ) ↔ 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝑍 𝐿 𝑋 ) ) )
22 9 21 mpbird ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ( 𝑋 𝐿 𝑌 ) )