Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem lt0negs2d

Description: Comparison of a surreal and its negative to zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2025)

Ref Expression
Hypothesis lt0negs2d.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
Assertion lt0negs2d ( 𝜑 → ( 0s <s 𝐴 ↔ ( -us ‘ 𝐴 ) <s 0s ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 lt0negs2d.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
2 0no ⊢ 0s ∈ No
3 ltnegs ⊢ ( ( 0s ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ No ) → ( 0s <s 𝐴 ↔ ( -us ‘ 𝐴 ) <s ( -us ‘ 0s ) ) )
4 2 1 3 sylancr ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 0s <s 𝐴 ↔ ( -us ‘ 𝐴 ) <s ( -us ‘ 0s ) ) )
5 neg0s ⊢ ( -us ‘ 0s ) = 0s
6 5 breq2i ⊢ ( ( -us ‘ 𝐴 ) <s ( -us ‘ 0s ) ↔ ( -us ‘ 𝐴 ) <s 0s )
7 4 6 bitrdi ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 0s <s 𝐴 ↔ ( -us ‘ 𝐴 ) <s 0s ) )