Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ltmuls12ad

Description: Comparison of the product of two positive surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2025)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses ltmuls12ad.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
ltmuls12ad.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
ltmuls12ad.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )
ltmuls12ad.4 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )
ltmuls12ad.5 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 0s ≤s 𝐴 )
ltmuls12ad.6 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵 )
ltmuls12ad.7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 0s ≤s 𝐶 )
ltmuls12ad.8 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷 )
Assertion ltmuls12ad ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 ·s 𝐶 ) <s ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐷 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ltmuls12ad.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
2 ltmuls12ad.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
3 ltmuls12ad.3 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ No )
4 ltmuls12ad.4 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ No )
5 ltmuls12ad.5 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 0s ≤s 𝐴 )
6 ltmuls12ad.6 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵 )
7 ltmuls12ad.7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 0s ≤s 𝐶 )
8 ltmuls12ad.8 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐶 <s 𝐷 )
9 1 3 mulscld ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 ·s 𝐶 ) ∈ No )
10 2 3 mulscld ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐶 ) ∈ No )
11 2 4 mulscld ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐷 ) ∈ No )
12 1 2 6 ltlesd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤s 𝐵 )
13 1 2 3 7 12 lemuls1ad ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 ·s 𝐶 ) ≤s ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐶 ) )
14 0no ⊢ 0s ∈ No
15 14 a1i ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 0s ∈ No )
16 15 1 2 5 6 leltstrd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 0s <s 𝐵 )
17 3 4 2 16 ltmuls2d ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐶 <s 𝐷 ↔ ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐶 ) <s ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐷 ) ) )
18 8 17 mpbid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐶 ) <s ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐷 ) )
19 9 10 11 13 18 leltstrd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 ·s 𝐶 ) <s ( 𝐵 ·s 𝐷 ) )