Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem midcom

Description: Commutativity rule for the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2019)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses ismid.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
ismid.d ⊢ − = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
ismid.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
ismid.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
ismid.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 DimTarskiG≥ 2 )
midcl.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 )
midcl.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃 )
Assertion midcom ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐵 ) = ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ismid.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 ismid.d ⊢ − = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
3 ismid.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
4 ismid.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
5 ismid.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 DimTarskiG≥ 2 )
6 midcl.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 )
7 midcl.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃 )
8 eqid ⊢ ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
9 eqid ⊢ ( pInvG ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( pInvG ‘ 𝐺 )
10 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 midcl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) ∈ 𝑃 )
11 eqid ⊢ ( ( pInvG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) ) = ( ( pInvG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) )
12 eqidd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) = ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) )
13 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 12 midcgr ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) − 𝐵 ) = ( ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) − 𝐴 ) )
14 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 midbtwn ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) ∈ ( 𝐵 𝐼 𝐴 ) )
15 1 2 3 8 9 4 10 11 6 7 13 14 ismir ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 = ( ( ( pInvG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) ) ‘ 𝐴 ) )
16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 ismidb ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐵 = ( ( ( pInvG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) ) ‘ 𝐴 ) ↔ ( 𝐴 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐵 ) = ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) ) )
17 15 16 mpbid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐴 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐵 ) = ( 𝐵 ( midG ‘ 𝐺 ) 𝐴 ) )