Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ovidig

Description: The value of an operation class abstraction. Compare ovidi . The condition ( x e. R /\ y e. S ) is been removed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses ovidig.1 ⊢ ∃* 𝑧 𝜑
ovidig.2 ⊢ 𝐹 = { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜑 }
Assertion ovidig ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 ) = 𝑧 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ovidig.1 ⊢ ∃* 𝑧 𝜑
2 ovidig.2 ⊢ 𝐹 = { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜑 }
3 df-ov ⊢ ( 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 ) = ( 𝐹 ‘ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ )
4 1 funoprab ⊢ Fun { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜑 }
5 2 funeqi ⊢ ( Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜑 } )
6 4 5 mpbir ⊢ Fun 𝐹
7 oprabidw ⊢ ( ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∈ { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜑 } ↔ 𝜑 )
8 7 biimpri ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∈ { ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∣ 𝜑 } )
9 8 2 eleqtrrdi ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∈ 𝐹 )
10 funopfv ⊢ ( Fun 𝐹 → ( ⟨ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ , 𝑧 ⟩ ∈ 𝐹 → ( 𝐹 ‘ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ) = 𝑧 ) )
11 6 9 10 mpsyl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐹 ‘ ⟨ 𝑥 , 𝑦 ⟩ ) = 𝑧 )
12 3 11 eqtrid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑥 𝐹 𝑦 ) = 𝑧 )