Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem plngmiropp

Description: Given a line A and a point X not on A , then a point Y on the plane defined by A and X is either opposite to X , or opposite to the mirror point of X by any point Z of A . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses plngmiropp.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
plngmiropp.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
plngmiropp.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
plngmiropp.e ⊢ 𝐸 = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
plngmiropp.s ⊢ 𝑆 = ( pInvG ‘ 𝐺 )
plngmiropp.m ⊢ 𝑀 = ( 𝑆 ‘ 𝑍 )
plngmiropp.o ⊢ 𝑂 = { ⟨ 𝑎 , 𝑏 ⟩ ∣ ( ( 𝑎 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ 𝐴 ) ) ∧ ∃ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 𝑡 ∈ ( 𝑎 𝐼 𝑏 ) ) }
plngmiropp.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
plngmiropp.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
plngmiropp.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ 𝐴 ) )
plngmiropp.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( ( 𝐴 𝐸 𝑋 ) ∖ 𝐴 ) )
plngmiropp.z ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴 )
Assertion plngmiropp ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑋 𝑂 𝑌 ∨ ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) 𝑂 𝑌 ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 plngmiropp.p ⊢ 𝑃 = ( Base ‘ 𝐺 )
2 plngmiropp.i ⊢ 𝐼 = ( Itv ‘ 𝐺 )
3 plngmiropp.l ⊢ 𝐿 = ( LineG ‘ 𝐺 )
4 plngmiropp.e ⊢ 𝐸 = ( hlG ‘ 𝐺 )
5 plngmiropp.s ⊢ 𝑆 = ( pInvG ‘ 𝐺 )
6 plngmiropp.m ⊢ 𝑀 = ( 𝑆 ‘ 𝑍 )
7 plngmiropp.o ⊢ 𝑂 = { ⟨ 𝑎 , 𝑏 ⟩ ∣ ( ( 𝑎 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ 𝐴 ) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ 𝐴 ) ) ∧ ∃ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 𝑡 ∈ ( 𝑎 𝐼 𝑏 ) ) }
8 plngmiropp.g ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
9 plngmiropp.a ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
10 plngmiropp.x ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ( 𝑃 ∖ 𝐴 ) )
11 plngmiropp.y ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( ( 𝐴 𝐸 𝑋 ) ∖ 𝐴 ) )
12 plngmiropp.z ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴 )
13 eqid ⊢ ( dist ‘ 𝐺 ) = ( dist ‘ 𝐺 )
14 9 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
15 8 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
16 11 eldifad ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝐴 𝐸 𝑋 ) )
17 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 16 plngssp ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 )
18 17 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 )
19 1 3 2 8 9 12 tglnpt ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 )
20 10 eldifad ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 )
21 1 13 2 3 5 8 19 6 20 mircl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) ∈ 𝑃 )
22 21 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) ∈ 𝑃 )
23 20 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 )
24 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 )
25 1 2 3 15 14 18 7 23 24 hpgcom ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → 𝑋 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑌 )
26 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 12 10 3 oppmir ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑋 𝑂 ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) )
27 1 2 3 7 8 9 20 17 21 26 lnopp2hpgb ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 𝑂 ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) ↔ 𝑋 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑌 ) )
28 27 biimpar ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑌 ) → 𝑌 𝑂 ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) )
29 25 28 syldan ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → 𝑌 𝑂 ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) )
30 1 13 2 7 3 14 15 18 22 29 oppcom ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ) → ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) 𝑂 𝑌 )
31 9 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿 )
32 8 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG )
33 17 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 )
34 20 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 )
35 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) → 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 )
36 1 13 2 7 3 31 32 33 34 35 oppcom ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) → 𝑋 𝑂 𝑌 )
37 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 7 17 elplng ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 ∈ ( 𝐴 𝐸 𝑋 ) ↔ ( 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) ) )
38 16 37 mpbid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) )
39 3orass ⊢ ( ( 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) ↔ ( 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ ( 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) ) )
40 38 39 sylib ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ ( 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) ) )
41 11 eldifbd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴 )
42 40 41 orcnd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑌 ( ( hpG ‘ 𝐺 ) ‘ 𝐴 ) 𝑋 ∨ 𝑌 𝑂 𝑋 ) )
43 30 36 42 orim12da ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) 𝑂 𝑌 ∨ 𝑋 𝑂 𝑌 ) )
44 43 orcomd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑋 𝑂 𝑌 ∨ ( 𝑀 ‘ 𝑋 ) 𝑂 𝑌 ) )