Description: Elimination of two antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-2013)
Ref | Expression | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hypotheses | pm2.61dda.1 | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ) → 𝜃 ) | |
pm2.61dda.2 | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜒 ) → 𝜃 ) | ||
pm2.61dda.3 | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ) ) → 𝜃 ) | ||
Assertion | pm2.61dda | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝜃 ) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pm2.61dda.1 | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ) → 𝜃 ) | |
2 | pm2.61dda.2 | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜒 ) → 𝜃 ) | |
3 | pm2.61dda.3 | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ) ) → 𝜃 ) | |
4 | 3 | anassrs | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ) ∧ 𝜒 ) → 𝜃 ) |
5 | 2 | adantlr | ⊢ ( ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ) ∧ ¬ 𝜒 ) → 𝜃 ) |
6 | 4 5 | pm2.61dan | ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ) → 𝜃 ) |
7 | 6 1 | pm2.61dan | ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝜃 ) |