Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem rabrexfi

Description: Conditions for a class abstraction with a restricted existential quantification to be finite. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses rabrexfi.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin )
rabrexfi.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ) → { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } ∈ Fin )
Assertion rabrexfi ( 𝜑 → { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 } ∈ Fin )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 rabrexfi.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin )
2 rabrexfi.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ) → { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } ∈ Fin )
3 iunrab ⊢ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } = { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 }
4 2 ralrimiva ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } ∈ Fin )
5 iunfi ⊢ ( ( 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } ∈ Fin ) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } ∈ Fin )
6 1 4 5 syl2anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓 } ∈ Fin )
7 3 6 eqeltrrid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → { 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 } ∈ Fin )