Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem reximssdv

Description: Derivation of a restricted existential quantification over a subset (the second hypothesis implies A C_ B ), deduction form. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses reximssdv.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 )
reximssdv.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓 ) ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
reximssdv.3 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓 ) ) → 𝜒 )
Assertion reximssdv ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 reximssdv.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 )
2 reximssdv.2 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓 ) ) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
3 reximssdv.3 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓 ) ) → 𝜒 )
4 2 3 jca ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓 ) ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒 ) )
5 4 ex ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓 ) → ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒 ) ) )
6 5 reximdv2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ) )
7 1 6 mpd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 )