Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem ruclem10

Description: Lemma for ruc . Every first component of the G sequence is less than every second component. That is, the sequences form a chain a_1 < a_2 < ... < b_2 < b_1, where a_i are the first components and b_i are the second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses ruc.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 : ℕ ⟶ ℝ )
ruc.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 = ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) , 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋ ( ( ( 1st ‘ 𝑥 ) + ( 2nd ‘ 𝑥 ) ) / 2 ) / 𝑚 ⦌ if ( 𝑚 < 𝑦 , ⟨ ( 1st ‘ 𝑥 ) , 𝑚 ⟩ , ⟨ ( ( 𝑚 + ( 2nd ‘ 𝑥 ) ) / 2 ) , ( 2nd ‘ 𝑥 ) ⟩ ) ) )
ruc.4 ⊢ 𝐶 = ( { ⟨ 0 , ⟨ 0 , 1 ⟩ ⟩ } ∪ 𝐹 )
ruc.5 ⊢ 𝐺 = seq 0 ( 𝐷 , 𝐶 )
ruclem10.6 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 )
ruclem10.7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 )
Assertion ruclem10 ( 𝜑 → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ) < ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 ruc.1 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 : ℕ ⟶ ℝ )
2 ruc.2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 = ( 𝑥 ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) , 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋ ( ( ( 1st ‘ 𝑥 ) + ( 2nd ‘ 𝑥 ) ) / 2 ) / 𝑚 ⦌ if ( 𝑚 < 𝑦 , ⟨ ( 1st ‘ 𝑥 ) , 𝑚 ⟩ , ⟨ ( ( 𝑚 + ( 2nd ‘ 𝑥 ) ) / 2 ) , ( 2nd ‘ 𝑥 ) ⟩ ) ) )
3 ruc.4 ⊢ 𝐶 = ( { ⟨ 0 , ⟨ 0 , 1 ⟩ ⟩ } ∪ 𝐹 )
4 ruc.5 ⊢ 𝐺 = seq 0 ( 𝐷 , 𝐶 )
5 ruclem10.6 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 )
6 ruclem10.7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 )
7 1 2 3 4 ruclem6 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐺 : ℕ0 ⟶ ( ℝ × ℝ ) )
8 7 5 ffvelcdmd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) )
9 xp1st ⊢ ( ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ) ∈ ℝ )
10 8 9 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ) ∈ ℝ )
11 6 5 ifcld ⊢ ( 𝜑 → if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ℕ0 )
12 7 11 ffvelcdmd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) )
13 xp1st ⊢ ( ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ∈ ℝ )
14 12 13 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ∈ ℝ )
15 7 6 ffvelcdmd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) )
16 xp2nd ⊢ ( ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) → ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ) ∈ ℝ )
17 15 16 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ) ∈ ℝ )
18 5 nn0red ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ )
19 6 nn0red ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℝ )
20 max1 ⊢ ( ( 𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℝ ) → 𝑀 ≤ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) )
21 18 19 20 syl2anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) )
22 5 nn0zd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ )
23 11 nn0zd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ℤ )
24 eluz ⊢ ( ( 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ℤ ) → ( if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) ↔ 𝑀 ≤ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) )
25 22 23 24 syl2anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) ↔ 𝑀 ≤ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) )
26 21 25 mpbird ⊢ ( 𝜑 → if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑀 ) )
27 1 2 3 4 5 26 ruclem9 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ) ≤ ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ∧ ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ≤ ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ) ) )
28 27 simpld ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ) ≤ ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) )
29 xp2nd ⊢ ( ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ∈ ( ℝ × ℝ ) → ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ∈ ℝ )
30 12 29 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ∈ ℝ )
31 1 2 3 4 ruclem8 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ℕ0 ) → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) < ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) )
32 11 31 mpdan ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) < ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) )
33 max2 ⊢ ( ( 𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℝ ) → 𝑁 ≤ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) )
34 18 19 33 syl2anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑁 ≤ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) )
35 6 nn0zd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ )
36 eluz ⊢ ( ( 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ℤ ) → ( if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑁 ) ↔ 𝑁 ≤ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) )
37 35 23 36 syl2anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑁 ) ↔ 𝑁 ≤ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) )
38 34 37 mpbird ⊢ ( 𝜑 → if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ∈ ( ℤ≥ ‘ 𝑁 ) )
39 1 2 3 4 6 38 ruclem9 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ) ≤ ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ∧ ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ≤ ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ) ) )
40 39 simprd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) ≤ ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ) )
41 14 30 17 32 40 ltletrd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ if ( 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 , 𝑁 , 𝑀 ) ) ) < ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ) )
42 10 14 17 28 41 lelttrd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 1st ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑀 ) ) < ( 2nd ‘ ( 𝐺 ‘ 𝑁 ) ) )