Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem stoweidlem18

Description: This theorem proves Lemma 2 in BrosowskiDeutsh p. 92 when A is empty, the trivial case. Here D is used to denote the set A of Lemma 2, because the variable A is used for the subalgebra. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017)

Ref Expression
Hypotheses stoweidlem18.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 𝐷
stoweidlem18.2 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 𝜑
stoweidlem18.3 ⊢ 𝐹 = ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ 1 )
stoweidlem18.4 ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝐽
stoweidlem18.5 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℝ ) → ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ 𝑎 ) ∈ 𝐴 )
stoweidlem18.6 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( Clsd ‘ 𝐽 ) )
stoweidlem18.7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+ )
stoweidlem18.8 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 = ∅ )
Assertion stoweidlem18 ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 stoweidlem18.1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 𝐷
2 stoweidlem18.2 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 𝜑
3 stoweidlem18.3 ⊢ 𝐹 = ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ 1 )
4 stoweidlem18.4 ⊢ 𝑇 = ∪ 𝐽
5 stoweidlem18.5 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℝ ) → ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ 𝑎 ) ∈ 𝐴 )
6 stoweidlem18.6 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( Clsd ‘ 𝐽 ) )
7 stoweidlem18.7 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+ )
8 stoweidlem18.8 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐷 = ∅ )
9 1re ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
10 5 stoweidlem4 ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ ) → ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ 1 ) ∈ 𝐴 )
11 9 10 mpan2 ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ 1 ) ∈ 𝐴 )
12 3 11 eqeltrid ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 )
13 0le1 ⊢ 0 ≤ 1
14 simpr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ) → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 )
15 3 fvmpt2 ⊢ ( ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ ) → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) = 1 )
16 14 9 15 sylancl ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ) → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) = 1 )
17 13 16 breqtrrid ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ) → 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) )
18 1le1 ⊢ 1 ≤ 1
19 16 18 eqbrtrdi ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ) → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 )
20 17 19 jca ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ) → ( 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) )
21 20 ex ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 → ( 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ) )
22 2 21 ralrimi ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) )
23 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 ∅
24 1 23 nfeq ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 𝐷 = ∅
25 24 rzalf ⊢ ( 𝐷 = ∅ → ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 )
26 8 25 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 )
27 1red ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 1 ∈ ℝ )
28 27 7 ltsubrpd ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < 1 )
29 28 adantr ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ) → ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < 1 )
30 4 cldss ⊢ ( 𝐵 ∈ ( Clsd ‘ 𝐽 ) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑇 )
31 6 30 syl ⊢ ( 𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑇 )
32 31 sselda ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ) → 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 )
33 32 9 15 sylancl ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ) → ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) = 1 )
34 29 33 breqtrrd ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ) → ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) )
35 34 ex ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 → ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) )
36 2 35 ralrimi ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) )
37 nfcv ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 𝑥
38 nfmpt1 ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 ( 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ 1 )
39 3 38 nfcxfr ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 𝐹
40 37 39 nfeq ⊢ Ⅎ 𝑡 𝑥 = 𝐹
41 fveq1 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) = ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) )
42 41 breq2d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( 0 ≤ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ↔ 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) )
43 41 breq1d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ↔ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) )
44 42 43 anbi12d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( ( 0 ≤ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ↔ ( 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ) )
45 40 44 ralbid ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ) )
46 41 breq1d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ↔ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ) )
47 40 46 ralbid ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ↔ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ) )
48 41 breq2d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ↔ ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) )
49 40 48 ralbid ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ↔ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) )
50 45 47 49 3anbi123d ⊢ ( 𝑥 = 𝐹 → ( ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) ↔ ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) ) )
51 50 rspcev ⊢ ( ( 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝐹 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) ) → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) )
52 12 22 26 36 51 syl13anc ⊢ ( 𝜑 → ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ( ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ( 0 ≤ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ∧ ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ≤ 1 ) ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) < 𝐸 ∧ ∀ 𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ( 1 − 𝐸 ) < ( 𝑥 ‘ 𝑡 ) ) )