Metamath Proof Explorer


Theorem tdeglem2

Description: Simplification of total degree for the univariate case. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Mar-2015)

Ref Expression
Assertion tdeglem2 ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m 1o ) ↦ ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) ) = ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m 1o ) ↦ ( ℂfld Σg ℎ ) )

Proof

Step Hyp Ref Expression
1 elmapi ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ℎ : { ∅ } ⟶ ℕ0 )
2 1 feqmptd ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ℎ = ( 𝑥 ∈ { ∅ } ↦ ( ℎ ‘ 𝑥 ) ) )
3 2 oveq2d ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ( ℂfld Σg ℎ ) = ( ℂfld Σg ( 𝑥 ∈ { ∅ } ↦ ( ℎ ‘ 𝑥 ) ) ) )
4 cnring ⊢ ℂfld ∈ Ring
5 ringmnd ⊢ ( ℂfld ∈ Ring → ℂfld ∈ Mnd )
6 4 5 mp1i ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ℂfld ∈ Mnd )
7 0ex ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
8 7 a1i ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ∅ ∈ V )
9 7 snid ⊢ ∅ ∈ { ∅ }
10 ffvelcdm ⊢ ( ( ℎ : { ∅ } ⟶ ℕ0 ∧ ∅ ∈ { ∅ } ) → ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) ∈ ℕ0 )
11 1 9 10 sylancl ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) ∈ ℕ0 )
12 11 nn0cnd ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) ∈ ℂ )
13 cnfldbas ⊢ ℂ = ( Base ‘ ℂfld )
14 fveq2 ⊢ ( 𝑥 = ∅ → ( ℎ ‘ 𝑥 ) = ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) )
15 13 14 gsumsn ⊢ ( ( ℂfld ∈ Mnd ∧ ∅ ∈ V ∧ ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) ∈ ℂ ) → ( ℂfld Σg ( 𝑥 ∈ { ∅ } ↦ ( ℎ ‘ 𝑥 ) ) ) = ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) )
16 6 8 12 15 syl3anc ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ( ℂfld Σg ( 𝑥 ∈ { ∅ } ↦ ( ℎ ‘ 𝑥 ) ) ) = ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) )
17 3 16 eqtrd ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } ) → ( ℂfld Σg ℎ ) = ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) )
18 df1o2 ⊢ 1o = { ∅ }
19 18 oveq2i ⊢ ( ℕ0 ↑m 1o ) = ( ℕ0 ↑m { ∅ } )
20 17 19 eleq2s ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m 1o ) → ( ℂfld Σg ℎ ) = ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) )
21 20 eqcomd ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m 1o ) → ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) = ( ℂfld Σg ℎ ) )
22 21 mpteq2ia ⊢ ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m 1o ) ↦ ( ℎ ‘ ∅ ) ) = ( ℎ ∈ ( ℕ0 ↑m 1o ) ↦ ( ℂfld Σg ℎ ) )